Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume 24, Issue 2 , Pages 91-93 , March 2006

Open versus robotic radical prostatectomy

References 

  1. Twiss C , Slova D , Lepor H . Outcomes for men younger than 50 years undergoing radical prostatectomy . Urology . 2005;66:11–66
  2. Link RE , Su LM , Sullivan W , et al.   Health related quality of life before and after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy . J Urol . 2005;173:175–179
  3. Roumeguere T , Bollens R , Vanden Bossche M , et al.   Radical prostatectomy (a prospective comparison of oncological and functional results between open and laparoscopic approaches) . World J Urol . 2003;20:360–366
  4. Namiki S , Egawa S , Baba S , et al.   Recovery of quality of life in one year after laparoscopic or retropubic radical prostatectomy (A multi-institutional longitudinal study) . Urology . 2005;65:517–523
  5. Patel R , Lepor H . Removal of urinary catheter on postoperative day 3 or 4 after radical retropubic prostatectomy . Urology . 2003;61:156–160
  6. Smith JA . Robotically assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (An assessment of its contemporary role in the surgical management localized prostate cancer) . Am J Surg . 2004;188:63S–67S

PII: S1078-1439(05)00224-3

doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2005.09.002

Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume 24, Issue 2 , Pages 91-93 , March 2006