Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume 26, Issue 2 , Pages 153-157, March 2008

The use of tumor markers in testis cancer in the United States: A potential quality issue

  • Scott M. Gilbert, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
  • ,
  • Stephanie Daignault, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
  • ,
  • Alon Z. Weizer, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
  • ,
  • John T. Wei, M.D., M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
  • ,
  • Brent K. Hollenbeck, M.D., M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1-734-615-6662; fax: +1-734-936-9127.

Received 10 October 2006; received in revised form 15 December 2006; accepted 21 December 2006. published online 16 November 2007.

Abstract 

Background

Performance measurement is currently being implemented at various levels to address issues related to quality of care. Administrative data and cancer registries provide a measure of health care delivery (processes) at the population level. In testis cancer, the use of tumor markers is an important component of care and may represent a measurable quality indicator. We analyzed the use of testis cancer tumor markers across the United States.

Methods

Incident germ cell testis cancer cases between 1998 and 2002 were abstracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Tumor marker codes were categorized as performed and not performed. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed. Logistic regression was used to determine the independent association of demographic and clinical factors with the failure to measure or document tumor markers.

Results

In 4,742 testis cancer cases, performance of both alpha fetoprotein and human chorionic gonadotropin was recorded in 44.7% of cases, while performance of alpha fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, and lactate dehydrogenase together occurred in only 16%. Tumor marker use did not increase considerably between 1998 and 2002, and significant variation existed between SEER sites. In multivariable models, disease stage and the interaction between SEER site and year were significantly associated with tumor marker use.

Conclusions

We have identified low and variable rates of tumor marker use in testis cancer cases recorded in SEER. As pay-for-performance evolves, standardized metrics for recommended processes of care (e.g., measurement of tumor markers in patients with testis cancer) may be tied to reimbursement. In this context, failure to document the use of tumor markers will be interpreted as less than optimal care.

Keywords: Testis cancer, Tumor markers, Quality of care, Performance measures

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 S.M.G. is supported by an NIH T32 training grant at the University of Michigan. B.K.H. is supported in part by the John and Suzanne Munn Idea Grant through the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center.

PII: S1078-1439(07)00002-6

doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2006.12.018

Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume 26, Issue 2 , Pages 153-157, March 2008