Volume 26, Issue 3 , Pages 260-265, May 2008
Understanding differences between high and low volume hospitals for radical prostatectomy☆
Abstract
Objectives
We evaluated the impact of the specialized medical and ancillary services available at low vs. high volume prostatectomy centers on prolonged length of stay (LOS) outcomes after radical prostatectomy.
Methods
Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we identified patients who underwent prostatectomy (n = 9,266) for prostate cancer in 2003 using ICD-9 codes. Hospital characteristics were ascertained using the American Hospital Association file. Differences in health services availability according to hospital prostatectomy volume were estimated using logistic regression. Logistic models were fitted to measure the effect of available health services on a prolonged LOS (>90 percentile for sample was 5 days).
Results
Among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy in 2003, 19.0% and 5.4% of patients had a prolonged LOS at low and high volume hospitals, respectively (unadjusted OR 4.2, 95% CI 2.5–6.9). After adjusting for differences in patients and availability of select health services, those treated at low volume centers were 3.3 times more likely to have a prolonged hospitalization compared with those treated at high volume hospitals (95% CI 1.9–5.6). Adjusting for hospital differences attenuated the volume effect by 14.8%.
Conclusions
There are substantial differences in the health care environment according to radical prostatectomy volume. Generally, high volume hospitals offer a much wider array of health care services specific to both post-prostatectomy and general medical care.
Keywords: Prostate cancer, Outcomes, Volume
To access this article, please choose from the options below
☆ B.K.H. is supported in part by a grant from the John and Suzanne Munn Endowed Research Fund of the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center.
PII: S1078-1439(07)00099-3
doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2007.04.001
© 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 26, Issue 3 , Pages 260-265, May 2008
