Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume 26, Issue 3 , Pages 250-253, May 2008

Correlation between BMD and bone scintigraphy in patients with prostate cancer

  • Hakki Perk, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Suleyman, Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +90-533-6267944; fax: +90-246-2371762.
  • ,
  • Mustafa Yildiz, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
  • ,
  • Alim Kosar, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Suleyman, Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
  • ,
  • Sureyya Cerci, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
  • ,
  • Feray Soyupek, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
  • ,
  • Alper Ozorak, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Suleyman, Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
  • ,
  • Cem Dilmen, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Suleyman, Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey

Received 23 January 2007; received in revised form 27 May 2007; accepted 29 May 2007. published online 30 November 2007.

Abstract 

Objective

Bone metastasis is a major cause of morbidity in prostatic cancer. Therefore, detecting and monitoring bone lesions are crucial for treatment of prostatic carcinoma. We aimed to evaluate total body bone mineral density and regional bone mineral density in patients with prostate cancer with and without metastases, and to compare them with bone scintigraphy.

Methods

Fifty-four patients with prostatic carcinoma and 20 healthy subjects were investigated with bone scintigraphy and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The bone scintigraphic findings were classified as normal (score 0: n = 22), abnormal but not typical for metastases (score 1: n = 18), and typical pattern of metastases (score 2: n = 14).

Results

The patients with bone metastases prostate cancer had significantly higher total bone mineral density and regional bone mineral density of trunk and pelvis than healthy controls and prostate cancer patients without bone metastases. There was a significant positive correlation between bone scan score and total bone mineral density and regional bone mineral density of trunk and pelvis (r = 0.328, P < 0.05, r = 0.60, P < 0.001, r = 0.480, P < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion

Our results show that patients of prostate cancer with bone metastases have increased bone mineral density (BMD) in the pelvis and trunk, possibly because of a predominance of osteoblastic over osteolytic metastases demonstrated by Tc-99m MDP bone scan.

Keywords: Prostate cancer, Bone scintigraphy, Bone mineral density, Bone metastasis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1078-1439(07)00159-7

doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2007.05.027

Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume 26, Issue 3 , Pages 250-253, May 2008