Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume 26, Issue 4 , Pages 346-352, July 2008

The once and future role of cytoreductive nephrectomy

Division of Urology, Departments of Surgery and of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and the University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Received 13 April 2007; accepted 25 May 2007. published online 15 January 2008.

Abstract 

The role of nephrectomy in the setting of metastatic renal cell carcinoma has long been controversial and has continued to evolve over the last two decades. The practice of cytoreductive nephrectomy has only recently been widely accepted following the publication of 2 large multi-center randomized controlled trials that established a survival benefit for those patients undergoing nephrectomy followed by interferon treatment. Half a decade later, the new paradigm looks set to be questioned with the rapid emergence of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This article reviews the evolution of cytoreductive nephrectomy and speculates on its role in the new frontier of molecular targeting for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Keywords: Renal cell carcinoma, Tyrosine kinase inhibitors, Cytoreductive nephrectomy, Metastatectomy, Interfon, Interleukin-2

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1078-1439(07)00161-5

doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2007.05.029

Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume 26, Issue 4 , Pages 346-352, July 2008