« Previous
Next »
Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume 26, Issue 4
, Pages 337-338
, July 2008
Biopsy of the small renal mass: Time to shift the clinical paradigm?
References
- Cancer Statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:43–66
- Cancer statistics, 2001. CA Cancer J Clin. 2001;51:15–36
- Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States. JAMA. 1999;281:1628–1631
- Rising incidence of small renal masses: A need to reassess treatment effect. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1331–1334
- Prospective analysis of computerized tomography and needle biopsy with permanent sectioning to determine the nature of solid renal masses in adults. J Urol. 2003;169:71–74
- Solid renal tumors: An analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol. 2003;170:2217–2220
- Exploring the learning curve, pathological outcomes, and perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy performed for renal mass. J Urol. 2005;173:1690–1694
- Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients. J Urol. 2003;170:64–68
- Five-year survival after surgical treatment for kidney cancer: A population-based competing risk analysis. Cancer. 2007;109:1763–1768
- Renal mass biopsy—a renaissance?. J Urol. 2008;179:20–27
- Renal Mass Core Biopsy: Accuracy and Impact on Clinical Management. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:563–570
- . Interventional radiology in the chest and abdomen. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:1364–1374
- Percutaneous core biopsy for renal masses: Indications, accuracy, and results. J Urol. 2007;178:1184–1188discussion 1188
PII: S1078-1439(08)00049-5
doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.03.001
© 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume 26, Issue 4
, Pages 337-338
, July 2008
