Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume 27, Issue 1 , Pages 89-91, January 2009

Positive surgical margins: The argument for androgen deprivation and chemotherapy

  • Celestia S. Higano, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1-206-288-1152; fax: +1-206-288-1196

Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA 98109, USA

Abstract 

Management of patients with positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy is a complex and debatable issue. It is clear, however, that many of these patients have high-risk disease characteristics. Because of a significant risk of relapse, patients with positive surgical margins and high-risk disease characteristics should be offered the option of participating in clinical trials evaluating the role of adjuvant therapy. A distinction between the concepts of adjuvant versus salvage therapy is made and the rationale for the use of androgen deprivation therapy, chemotherapy, or a combination in the adjuvant setting is discussed in the context of the on-going phase III trials in the United States.

Keywords: High-risk, Adjuvant, Androgen deprivation, Chemotherapy, Positive surgical margins

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1078-1439(08)00077-X

doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.04.003

Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume 27, Issue 1 , Pages 89-91, January 2009