Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume 28, Issue 3 , Pages 268-273, May 2010

Impact of radical prostatectomy positive surgical margins on fear of cancer recurrence: Results from CaPSURE™

  • Y. Mark Hong, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1-617-947-7170; fax: +1-202-741-3114
  • ,
  • Jim C. Hu, M.D., MPH

      Affiliations

    • Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
  • ,
  • Alan T. Paciorek, B.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
  • ,
  • Sara J. Knight, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychiatry, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
  • ,
  • Peter R. Carroll, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA

Received 14 June 2008; received in revised form 10 July 2008 published online 13 October 2008.

Abstract 

Purpose

Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a significant source of distress in men with prostate cancer and could affect clinical decision-making, especially in those with positive margins following radical prostatectomy (RP). We examined the influence of positive surgical margin status on fear of cancer recurrence in men undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Methods

Five hundred eight-four men underwent RP from 1999 to 2002 in CaPSURE™, a prospective, longitudinal, national cohort. All men had both baseline and follow-up assessment of FCR using a validated Kornblith scale. Statistical analysis included χ2 test, Wald test, and linear as well as repeated measures ANOVA mixed model.

Results

One hundred sixty (27%) men had positive surgical margins. Baseline FCR and clinical variables did not differ based on margin status. Men with positive margins experienced greater FCR after RP than negative margins (OR, 1.94, 95% CI, 1.22–3.07). Men who had received adjuvant therapy experienced greater FCR (OR, 2.78, 95% CI, 1.21–6.39). Repeated measures analysis showed greater FCR over time (14-month mean follow-up, range 2–31 months) for positive vs. negative margins (P = 0.02). This difference in fear widened over time. There were no significant differences in health-related quality of life scores based on margin status.

Conclusion

Positive surgical margin status is associated with greater fear of cancer recurrence, a difference not alleviated by adjuvant therapy use. Men with positive margins remain more fearful over the course of several years compared with those with negative margins. Clinicians should be aware of the potential stressful impact of positive surgical margins.

Keywords: Prostatic neoplasms, Pathology, Surgery, Neoplasm recurrence, Local, Adaptation, Psychological, Fear, Prostatectomy, Psychology, Quality of life, Sickness impact profile, Mental health

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was funded by an educational grant from TAP Pharmaceuticals.

PII: S1078-1439(08)00162-2

doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.07.004

Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume 28, Issue 3 , Pages 268-273, May 2010