Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume 28, Issue 5 , Pages 500-503, September 2010

Are patients with hematuria appropriately referred to Urology? A multi-institutional questionnaire based survey

  • Alan M. Nieder, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: 305-674-2499; fax: 305-674-2899
  • ,
  • Yair Lotan, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
  • ,
  • Geoffrey R. Nuss, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
  • ,
  • Joshua P. Langston, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
  • ,
  • Sachin Vyas, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
  • ,
  • Murugesan Manoharan, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
  • ,
  • Mark S. Soloway, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA

Received 26 August 2008; received in revised form 14 October 2008; accepted 15 October 2008. published online 22 December 2008.

Abstract 

Introduction

Hematuria is a common finding that may be a sign of serious underlying urologic disease. Thus, the AUA guidelines (written in conjunction with the American Academy of Family Practice) recommend urologic evaluation for patients with both microscopic and gross hematuria. We sought to evaluate practice patterns of the evaluation of hematuria by primary care physicians (PCPs) in two locations in the United States.

Methods

Anonymous questionnaires regarding use of urinalysis (UA) and evaluation of hematuria were mailed to 586 PCPs in Miami, Florida and 1,915 in Dallas, Texas. Surveys were mailed to physicians who identified themselves as practitioners of internal medicine, family practice, primary care, or obstetrics and gynecology.

Results

Surveys were completed by 788 PCPs including 270 (46%) and 518 (26%) PCPs in Miami and Dallas, respectively. Screening UAs were obtained on all patients by 77% and 64%, of physicians in Miami and Dallas, respectively. In both Miami and Dallas, only 36% of PCPs reported referring patients with microscopic hematuria to an urologist. In patients with gross hematuria, referral rates were 77% and 69% in Miami and Dallas, respectively.

Conclusions

While many PCPs use UA in many of their patients routinely, few PCPs automatically refer their patients with microscopic hematuria to urology and not all patients with gross hematuria are referred. Further investigations regarding why and when patients are referred to urology is warranted. Increasing awareness of the complete and timely evaluation of hematuria may be beneficial in preventing a delay in bladder cancer.

Keywords: Bladder cancer, Hematuria, Screening

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1078-1439(08)00313-X

doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.10.018

Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume 28, Issue 5 , Pages 500-503, September 2010