Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume 30, Issue 1 , Pages 33-37, January 2012

C-reactive protein as an adverse prognostic marker for men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC): Confirmatory results

  • Renee C. Prins, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University (Sam Jackson Park Rd.), Portland, OR 97239, USA
  • ,
  • Brooks L. Rademacher, B.A.

      Affiliations

    • OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University (Bond Ave.), Portland, OR 97239, USA
  • ,
  • Solange Mongoue-Tchokote, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University (Sam Jackson Park Rd.), Portland, OR 97239, USA
  • ,
  • Joshi J. Alumkal, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University (Bond Ave.), Portland, OR 97239, USA
  • ,
  • Julie N. Graff, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University (Bond Ave.), Portland, OR 97239, USA
  • ,
  • Kristine M. Eilers, B.A.

      Affiliations

    • OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University (Bond Ave.), Portland, OR 97239, USA
  • ,
  • Tomasz M. Beer, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University (Bond Ave.), Portland, OR 97239, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1-503-494-0365; fax: +1-503-494-6197

Received 6 October 2009; received in revised form 10 November 2009; accepted 10 November 2009. published online 08 March 2010.

Article Outline

Abstract 

We previously reported that higher serum concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP) are associated with shorter survival in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). To confirm this finding in an independent data set, we used 119 CRPC patients enrolled in 6 phase II clinical trials and examined the relationship of CRP, alkaline phosphatase, hemoglobin, age, ECOG PS, and prostate specific antigen (PSA) with survival. Median follow-up was 19.7 months (0.9–98.5 months), and 89% have died. After analyzing the form of the risk function using the generalized additive model method, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess associations between baseline individual categorical and continuous variables. Quartiles of CRP were: 0–1.0, 1.1–4.9, 5.0–17.0, and 17.1–311 mg/L. In a Cox multivariate model, log2 (CRP) (HR 1.106, P = 0.013) as well as hemoglobin and alkaline phosphatase were independently associated with survival, confirming that higher CRP is associated with shorter survival in CRPC. Since CRP is a marker of inflammation, this finding suggests that inflammation may play an important role in the natural history of advanced prostate cancer. CRP is a readily measurable biomarker that has the potential to improve prognostic models and should be validated in a prospective clinical trial.

Keywords:  Prostate cancer , C-reactive protein , Prognosis , Inflammation , Survival

 

Back to Article Outline

1. Introduction 

The complex relationship between inflammation and cancer has been well-described since the late 1800s [1]. The principal purpose of an acute inflammatory response is to create a protective tissue microenvironment that allows for recognition and attempted repair of cell damage, as well as the elimination of pathogens and permanently damaged cells. Persistent inflammation, however, may promote tumor formation [2], [3].

The intricate molecular and cellular mechanisms responsible for the association between inflammation and cancer have recently become subjects of intense study. Chronic inflammation is thought to induce carcinogenesis through a variety of mechanisms, including irreversible cellular and DNA damage through the generation of free radicals, and the promotion of rapid cellular growth through DNA and cellular replication [4]. Finally, a microenvironment rich in angiogenesis-promoting growth factors is created with the intent of repairing inflamed tissue, but instead establishes the ideal conditions conducive to tumor growth [2], [3], [5], [6].

Well-established epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that inflammatory diseases increase the risk of developing cancer. For example, gastric infection with Helicobacter pylori [7], inflammatory bowel disease [8], and chronic hepatitis [9] have all been linked to malignancies of the affected organs. In fact, it has been estimated that infections and inflammatory responses may be linked to upwards of 15% of worldwide cancer deaths [10]. Specifically regarding prostate cancer, it has been hypothesized that chronic intraprostatic inflammation—such as that associated with chronic prostatitis—may contribute to its development [11]. Several retrospective case-control studies have reported a positive association between prostatitis and prostate cancer [12]. Further supporting the link between chronic inflammation and cancer is the evidence that treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has been found to decrease the incidence not only of prostate cancer [13], [14] but also of several other solid tumors [15], [16], [17], although not all studies have upheld this finding [18], [19], [20], [21].

C-reactive protein (CRP), an acute-phase reactant first described circa 1930, is a sensitive marker of tissue damage and inflammation [22], [23]. A growing body of literature has described a correlation between circulating CRP serum levels and poor prognosis in patients with various solid tumors. Elevated CRP has been associated with shorter survival in melanoma [24], colorectal cancer [25], non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [26], esophageal carcinoma [27], cervical cancer [28], endometrial cancer [29], ovarian cancer [30], and renal cell carcinoma [31].

We previously reported that higher serum concentrations of CRP are associated with shorter overall survival (OS) in patients with CRPC, and that it also predicts a lower probability of PSA response to docetaxel-based therapy [32]. In this study, we sought to confirm these findings in an independent data set.

Back to Article Outline

2. Materials and methods 

2.1. Patients 

Patients with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) from 6 institutional phase II clinical trials were included in this analysis. Detailed eligibility criteria and the treatment in each of these studies have previously been described [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38]. Regimens tested included calcitriol + docetaxel, calcitriol + docetaxel + estramustine, calcitriol + carboplatin, imatinib and zoledronic acid, and abarelix. All patients had evidence of progression after standard androgen suppression therapy; 90.8% of patients had metastases and 15.5% had prior chemotherapy exposure. The median follow-up time was 19.7 months (range 0.9–98.5 months), and 89.1% of patients have died. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for all studies and for biomarker analyses, and informed consent was obtained from all patients contributing samples.

2.2. Sample handling and assays 

Blood samples were collected from 119 CRPC patients prior to initiation of therapy. All baseline samples were plasma, except for one serum sample. Plasma was separated by centrifugation at 3,000 revolutions per minute (rpm), and samples were stored at −80°C. CRP concentration was measured using turbidimetric measurement of agglutinated anti-CRP antibody/CRP complexes (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN).

2.3. Statistical methods 

The endpoint of interest was OS, defined as the time from day 1 of the start of therapy to death from any cause. Baseline covariates included in the analyses were age, alkaline phosphatase, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, hemoglobin, PSA, and CRP. Because the distribution of alkaline phosphatase, CRP, and PSA were skewed, a logarithmic transformation (base 2) was applied. Generalized additive models [39] were used to visually assess functional relationships between the continuous covariates and the risk of death. The risk function of each covariate was analyzed using the GAM package available in the R (www.r-project.org) software. We were thus able to determine if a covariate would be best analyzed as a continuous or categorical predictor in subsequent analyses [40]. Multivariate analysis was performed using stepwise Cox regression in order to assess the association between the above modified covariates and OS. Statistical significance was defined as a P < 0.05.

Back to Article Outline

3. Results 

3.1. Patient demographics 

Baseline characteristics of the 119 patients are shown in Table 1; 90.8% had radiographically demonstrated metastases while the others had CRPC manifested by a rising PSA on androgen suppression therapy only; 57 of these patients were enrolled in clinical trials of docetaxel-based chemotherapy while the remainder received other investigational regimens. None of these patients received the current FDA-approved regimen of docetaxel and prednisone. Quartiles of CRP were: 0–1.0, 1.1–4.9, 5.0–17.0, and 17.1–311 mg/L, somewhat lower than in our previous study.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients
Treatment regimen
Calcitriol+docetaxel (n)34
Abarelix+orchiectomy (n)12
Abarelix+LHRH antagonist (n)18
Calcitriol+docetaxel + estramustine (n)23
Carboplatin+calcitriol (n)17
Imatinib+zoledronic acid (n)15
Total (n)119
Median age (range), years71.9(45.8–91.5)
ECOG performance status
034.5%
>065.5%
Median PSA (range), ng/mL80.8(0.8–2113)
Median hemoglobin (range), g/dl12.4(8.4–16.7)
Median alkaline phosphatase (range), U/l113(33–1304)
Median CRP (range), mg/l5.0(1–311)
Metastasis (all sites)90.8%
Chemotherapy naive84.5%
Subjects still alive10.9%
Median follow-up time (range), months19.7(0.9–98.5)

3.2. Overall survival 

Based on the GAM analysis, the risk function for the log2 transformed baseline alkaline phosphatase was best analyzed categorically in 2 groups, above or below 238.9 U/L, whereas hemoglobin displayed a decrease in risk. The risk of death increased as log2 (CRP) increased. Baseline age was categorized into three groups (50–60 years, 60–80 years and >80 years of age). The risk function increased with the log2 (PSA) and then decreased for log2 (PSA) >8, thus the log2 (PSA) variable was categorized into two groups (log2 (PSA) ≤ 8 or >8).

In the univariate Cox proportional hazard model, log2 (CRP) was a significant predictor of shorter OS. The impact of an elevated baseline CRP on OS is shown in Fig. 1.

  • View full-size image.
  • Fig. 1. 

    Kaplan-Meier curve of below the median (≤5 mg/L) or above the median (>5 mg/l) C-reactive protein (CRP) on overall survival in men with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (log rank P < 0.0001). (Color version of figure is available online.)

Using multivariate analysis with stepwise Cox regression model, we analyzed age, alkaline phosphatase, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, hemoglobin, PSA, and CRP. In this multivariate analysis (Table 2), an elevated CRP remained a significant independent predictor of shorter survival (P = 0.013), showing a 10.6% increase in risk for every doubling of CRP. Baseline hemoglobin was inversely and significantly associated with OS (P = 0.006). Alkaline phosphatase was also significantly associated with OS (P = 0.014), showing a 2-fold increase in risk of death for a baseline level greater than 238.9 U/L. Age, ECOG performance status, and PSA were not significant predictors of survival in the multivariate model. A stratified analysis by disease extent (metastatic vs. PSA only) yielded the same results, but lacked power in the PSA only subgroup.

Table 2. Independent risk factors for death
Prognostic factorHR(95% CI)P
CRP (continuous, per each doubling of CRP)1.106(1.022–1.197)0.013
Alkaline phosphatase (categorical, above vs. below 238.9 U/l)1.944(1.144–3.302)0.014
Hemoglobin (continuous, per each g/dl)0.819(0.711–0.943)0.006

Back to Article Outline

4. Discussion 

In our independent data set of patients with CRPC, we confirmed our initial finding that elevated baseline CRP is associated with shorter OS. Recent evidence has suggested that elevated CRP is not only a marker of inflammation and cancer, but also plays a functional role in the proliferation of tumor cells. CRP has been found to inhibit apoptosis of myeloma cells, thereby directly regulating tumor cell growth and survival [41]. Moreover, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, commonly known as statins, decrease levels of circulating CRP [42], a finding which, in addition to the primary lipid lowering properties, may be another mechanism by which statins may decrease the risk of prostate cancer and other solid tumors [43], [44]. The possibility that CRP may contribute to the pathogenesis of cancer indicates that CRP (in addition to inflammation) may be a potential target for novel cancer treatments.

Our current study has some limitations. As in our previous study, a sample size of 119 patients is modest for a complete analysis of potential prognostic markers in men with CRPC. Additionally, although prognostic models that predict the OS probability for patients with CRPC are well established in the medical literature [45], [46], we were not able to include all of these available predictors in this current study as these data were not uniformly collected in all patients. A larger sample size that includes data from a comprehensive set of prognostic factors would be needed to incorporate CRP into current prognostic models. Our effort was more modest, however, and sought to confirm our initial finding that CRP elevations are associated with shorter survival in an unrelated patient group. For this purpose, our patient sample proved adequate. With only 57 patients receiving docetaxel-based chemotherapy, our study did not have sufficient power to determine if CRP was associated with the probability of PSA decline in response to docetaxel-based chemotherapy in CRPC.

Similar to all studies of CRP, we were unable to determine the specific causes of CRP elevation in these patients and unable to distinguish between increased CRP due to the presence of cancer from increased CRP related to other medical conditions. Although a formal determination of the cause of death in our patient subset was not performed, we would expect that the vast majority of these patients with CRPC die of prostate cancer rather than other co-morbid conditions [47].

Together with our prior results, we now have two retrospective analyses of independent data sets, which demonstrate that baseline elevated CRP is associated with shorter survival in CRPC. This readily measurable biomarker should now be examined prospectively in a larger study that incorporates a broad range of potential prognostic factors. If prospective evaluation further confirms our findings, the inclusion of CRP may enhance the performance of current prognostic models. Unlike many of the other prognostic markers, CRP levels, as well as the underlying inflammation, are potentially modifiable. Thus, a better understanding of how inflammation, and potentially CRP itself, affects cancer progression and treatment resistance may have the potential to point the way toward improved therapies and outcomes in advanced prostate cancer.

Back to Article Outline

Acknowledgments 

The authors acknowledge support in part for this work by a generous donation from Robert and Diana Gerding. Biostatistics support was provided by the Biostatistics Shared Resource of the Knight Cancer Institute (NIH/NCI P30 CA069533).

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Balkwill F , Mantovani A . Inflammation and cancer: Back to Virchow? . Lancet . 2001;357:539–545
  2. Coussens LM , Werb Z . Inflammation and cancer . Nature . 2002;420:860–867
  3. Mantovani A , Allavena P , Sica A , et al.  Cancer-related inflammation . Nature . 2008;454:436–444
  4. Hussain SP , Hofseth LJ , Harris CC . Radical causes of cancer . Nat Rev Cancer . 2003;3:276–285
  5. Ames BN , Gold LS , Willett WC . The causes and prevention of cancer . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA . 1995;92:5258–5265
  6. Cerutti PA , Trump BF . Inflammation and oxidative stress in carcinogenesis . Cancer Cells . 1991;3:1–7
  7. Parsonnet J , Friedman GD , Vandersteen DP , et al.  Helicobacter pylori infection and the risk of gastric carcinoma . N Engl J Med . 1991;325:1127–1131
  8. Rhodes JM , Campbell BJ . Inflammation and colorectal cancer: IBD-associated and sporadic cancer compared . Trends Mol Med . 2002;8:10–16
  9. Imperial JC . Natural history of chronic hepatitis B and C . J Gastroenterol Hepatol . 1999;14(Suppl):S1–S5
  10. Pisani P , Parkin DM , Munoz N , et al.  Cancer and infection: Estimates of the attributable fraction in 1990 . Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev . 1997;6:387–400
  11. De Marzo AM , Marchi VL , Epstein JI , et al.  Proliferative inflammatory atrophy of the prostate: Implications for prostatic carcinogenesis . Am J Pathol . 1999;155:1985–1992
  12. Dennis LK , Lynch CF , Torner JC . Epidemiologic association between prostatitis and prostate cancer . Urology . 2002;60:78–83
  13. Mahmud S , Franco E , Aprikian A . Prostate cancer and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Systematic review and meta-analysis . Br J Cancer . 2004;90:93–99
  14. Nelson JE , Harris RE . Inverse association of prostate cancer and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): Results of a case-control study . Oncol Rep . 2000;7:169–170
  15. Corley DA , Kerlikowske K , Verma R , et al.  Protective association of aspirin/NSAIDs and esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis . Gastroenterology . 2003;124:47–56
  16. Dannenberg AJ , Subbaramaiah K . Targeting cyclooxygenase-2 in human neoplasia: Rationale and promise . Cancer Cell . 2003;4:431–436
  17. Suh O , Mettlin C , Petrelli N . Aspirin use, cancer, and polyps of the large bowel . Cancer . 1993;72:1171–1177
  18. Cook NR , Lee IM , Gaziano JM , et al.  Low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cancer: The Women's Health Study: A randomized controlled trial . JAMA . 2005;294:47–55
  19. Daniels NA , Chen YH , Bent S . Antibiotic and anti-inflammatory use and the risk of prostate cancer . BMC Res Notes . 2009;2:57
  20. Eliassen AH , Chen WY , Spiegelman D , et al.  Use of aspirin, other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and acetaminophen and risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women in The Nurses' Health Study II . Arch Intern Med . 2009;169:115–121 Discussion 21
  21. Genkinger JM , De Vivo I , Stampfer MJ , et al.  Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use and risk of bladder cancer in the health professionals follow-up study . Int J Cancer . 2007;120:2221–2225
  22. Pepys MB , Hirschfield GM . C-reactive protein: A critical update . J Clin Invest . 2003;111:1805–1812
  23. Tillett WS , Francis T . Serological reactions in pneumonia with a non-protein somatic fraction of Pneumococcus . J Exp Med . 1930;52:561–571
  24. Tartour E , Dorval T , Mosseri V , et al.  Serum interleukin 6 and C-reactive protein levels correlate with resistance to IL-2 therapy and poor survival in melanoma patients . Br J Cancer . 1994;69:911–913
  25. Nozoe T , Matsumata T , Kitamura M , et al.  Significance of preoperative elevation of serum C-reactive protein as an indicator for prognosis in colorectal cancer . Am J Surg . 1998;176:335–338
  26. Legouffe E , Rodriguez C , Picot MC , et al.  C-reactive protein serum level is a valuable and simple prognostic marker in non Hodgkin's lymphoma . Leuk Lymphoma . 1998;31:351–357
  27. Nozoe T , Saeki H , Sugimachi K . Significance of preoperative elevation of serum C-reactive protein as an indicator of prognosis in esophageal carcinoma . Am J Surg . 2001;182:197–201
  28. Polterauer S , Grimm C , Tempfer C , et al.  C-reactive protein is a prognostic parameter in patients with cervical cancer . Gynecol Oncol . 2007;107:114–117
  29. Schmid M , Schneitter A , Hinterberger S , et al.  Association of elevated C-reactive protein levels with an impaired prognosis in patients with surgically treated endometrial cancer . Obstet Gynecol . 2007;110:1231–1236
  30. Hefler LA , Concin N , Hofstetter G , et al.  Serum C-reactive protein as independent prognostic variable in patients with ovarian cancer . Clin Cancer Res . 2008;14:710–714
  31. Tatokoro M , Saito K , Iimura Y , et al.  Prognostic impact of postoperative C-reactive protein level in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy . J Urol . 2008;180:515–519
  32. Beer TM , Lalani AS , Lee S , et al.  C-reactive protein as a prognostic marker for men with androgen-independent prostate cancer: Results from the ASCENT trial . Cancer . 2008;112:2377–2383
  33. Beer TM , Garzotto M , Katovic NM . High-dose calcitriol and carboplatin in metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer . Am J Clin Oncol . 2004;27:535–541
  34. Tiffany NM , Ryan CW , Garzotto M , et al.  High dose pulse calcitriol, docetaxel, and estramustine for androgen independent prostate cancer: A phase I/II study . J Urol . 2005;174:888–892
  35. Beer TM , Eilers KM , Garzotto M , et al.  Weekly high-dose calcitriol and docetaxel in metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer . J Clin Oncol . 2003;21:123–128
  36. Tiffany NM , Wersinger EM , Garzotto M , et al.  Imatinib mesylate and zoledronic acid in androgen-independent prostate cancer . Urology . 2004;63:934–939
  37. Beer TM , Garzotto M , Eilers KM , et al.  Targeting FSH in androgen-independent prostate cancer: Abarelix for prostate cancer progressing after orchiectomy . Urology . 2004;63:342–347
  38. Beer TM , Garzotto M , Eilers KM , et al.  Phase II study of abarelix depot for androgen independent prostate cancer progression during gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy . J Urol . 2003;169:1738–1741
  39. Hastie T , Tibshirani R . Exploring the nature of covariate effects in the proportional hazards model . Biometrics . 1990;46:1005–1016
  40. Garzotto M , Beer TM , Hudson RG , et al.  Improved detection of prostate cancer using classification and regression tree analysis . J Clin Oncol . 2005;23:4322–4329
  41. Yang J , Wezeman M , Zhang X , et al.  Human C-reactive protein binds activating Fcγ receptors and protects myeloma tumor cells from apoptosis . Cancer Cell . 2007;12:252–265
  42. Albert MA , Danielson E , Rifai N , et al.  Effect of statin therapy on C-reactive protein levels: The pravastatin inflammation/CRP evaluation (PRINCE): A randomized trial and cohort study . JAMA . 2001;286:64–70
  43. Poynter JN , Gruber SB , Higgins PD , et al.  Statins and the risk of colorectal cancer . N Engl J Med . 2005;352:2184–2192
  44. Shannon J , Tewoderos S , Garzotto M , et al.  Statins and prostate cancer risk: A case-control study . Am J Epidemiol . 2005;162:318–325
  45. Halabi S , Small EJ , Kantoff PW , et al.  Prognostic model for predicting survival in men with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer . J Clin Oncol . 2003;21:1232–1237
  46. Armstrong AJ , Garrett-Mayer ES , Yang YC , et al.  A contemporary prognostic nomogram for men with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer: A TAX327 study analysis . Clin Cancer Res . 2007;13:6396–6403
  47. Pound CR , Partin AW , Eisenberger MA , et al.  Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy . JAMA . 1999;281:1591–1597

PII: S1078-1439(09)00365-2

doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.11.012

Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume 30, Issue 1 , Pages 33-37, January 2012