Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Articles in Press

Return to articles in press list

Prospective comparison of PSA kinetics following two different prostate cancer brachytherapy planning methods: Preoperative and real-time intraoperative dosimetry planning

Haim Matzkin, M.D.a, Juza Chen, M.D.a, Amira Stenger, R.N., M.A.a, Rubi Agai, B.Sc.b, Nicola J. Mabjeesh, M.D., Ph.D.aCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 21 September 2009; received in revised form 30 November 2009; accepted 1 December 2009. published online 02 March 2010.
Corrected Proof

Abstract 

Objectives

Preoperative planning (PP) and intraoperative planning (IoP) are established 125I-brachytherapy techniques for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. We prospectively compared the effects of each method on reducing PSA levels.

Materials and methods

One hundred eighty patients treated with brachytherapy as monotherapy without neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy or external beam radiation using PP (75) or IoP (105) methodologies and with ≥5 years of follow-up were included in the study. CT-based dosimetry was calculated 1 month postoperatively. PSA was obtained every 3 months for the first year and semiannually thereafter. Available PSA and dosimetric data from both groups were analyzed and compared.

Results

At 5 years after brachytherapy, the probability of having a nadir PSA value < 0.5 ng/ml was 90% in the IoP group compared with 60% in the PP group (P < 0.0001). The rate of PSA decline was 3-fold faster in the IoP group than in the PP group. Dosimetry results highly favored the IoP method: mean V100 (%) and D90 (Gy) were 95 and 180 vs. 60 and 81 (P < 0.001), respectively.

Conclusions

Our initial finding of highly superior postimplant CT dosimetry calculations of the IoP method are now substantiated by the biochemical favorable results (PSA kinetics) of this method.

a Department of Urology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

b Department of Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +972-3-697-4544; fax: +972-3-697-3183

PII: S1078-1439(09)00401-3

doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.12.001