Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Articles in Press

Return to articles in press list

Significance of focal proliferative atrophy lesions in prostate biopsy cores that test negative for prostate carcinoma

Anastasios D. Asimakopoulos, M.D.a1Corresponding Author Informationemail address, Roberto Miano, M.D.a1, Alessandro Mauriello, M.D.b, Sara Costantini, M.D.b, Patrizio Pasqualetticd, Emanuele Liberati, M.D.a, Enrico Finazzi Agrò, M.D.a, Stefano Germani, M.D.a, Guido Virgili, M.D.a, Giuseppe Vespasiani, M.D.a

Received 4 September 2009; received in revised form 27 January 2010; accepted 28 January 2010. published online 10 May 2010.
Corrected Proof

Abstract 

Objectives

To evaluate the prevalence and short-term follow-up of focal proliferative atrophy lesions, either with or without the presence of inflammation (PIA/PA), and its correlation with the PSA levels, focusing on the prostate biopsy cores that test negative for prostate adenocarcinoma (PCa).

Methods

Five hundred fifty consecutive patients who had undergone a transrectal ultrasound-guided transperineal prostate biopsy were evaluated retrospectively for the presence and follow-up of focal proliferative atrophy lesions. PIA/PA were defined according to De Marzo. The prevalence of atrophy in PCa and negative biopsy cores was compared by means of χ2. After logarithmic transformations of the PSA values, t-test and ANOVA were applied for the comparison of the means. Incidence of newly diagnosed PCa during follow-up (mean 33.7 months) in patients with or without focal proliferative atrophy was compared by means of χ2.

Results

A focal atrophic lesion resulted in 161/339 negative biopsies. PIA was observed in 93/161 patients (57.8%), while PA was observed in the remaining 68/161 (42.2%). Among the negative biopsy cases, the difference in PSA values were not statistically significant according to the presence or absence of atrophy (P = 0.120). The group of negative biopsies with PIA was similar in terms of PSA characteristics with the benign (PA P = 0.738; non-atrophy P = 0.342), and cancer subgroups (P = 0.094); 245/339 (72.3%) patients were successfully followed-up. Biopsy was repeated in 24/71 (33.8%) patients with PIA, in 14/50 (28%) with PA and in 27/124 (21.7%) with no atrophy lesions at initial biopsy. The incidence of newly diagnosed PCa in the 3 groups was not statistically different (χ2, P = 0.81).

Conclusions

Focal proliferative atrophy lesions are a common finding in biopsy specimens negative for PCa. Patients with negative biopsy associated with PIA presented similar PSA characteristics as patients with biopsy-proven PCa. However, the incidence of PCa at short-term follow-up did not differ significantly between patients with PIA, PA, or no atrophic lesions at initial biopsy. Based on our findings, early repeat biopsy does not seem to be necessary after an initial diagnosis of PIA/PA, although a longer follow-up is mandatory for definitive conclusions.

a Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Policlinico Tor Vergata, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy

b Institute of Pathology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy

c Medical Statistics and Information Technology, Fatebenefratelli Association for the Research, Isola Tiberina, Rome, Italy

d Casa di Cura San Raffaele Cassino e Irccs San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +39-06-20902835; fax: +39-06-20902975

1 These authors contributed equally to this work.

PII: S1078-1439(10)00038-4

doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.01.010