« Previous
Next »
Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume 28, Issue 4
, Pages 389-400
, July 2010
Statistical consideration for clinical biomarker research in bladder cancer
References
- . Search for biomarkers of aggressiveness in bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2006;50:20–22
- American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:118–145
- Innovations in serum and urine markers in prostate cancer current European research in the P-Mark project. Eur Urol. 2005;48:1031–1041
- Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools. Future Oncol. 2009;5:1555–1584
- . Cutpoints in clinical chemistry: Time for fundamental reassessment. Clin Chem. 2009;55:15–17
- Assessing the performance of prediction models: A framework for traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology. 2010;21:128–138
- . Bladder cancer markers in patient management: The current perspective. World J Urol. 2008;26:1–3
- . Biomarker discovery and validation: Technologies and integrative approaches. Trends Biotechnol. 2004;22:411–416
- Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: Preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001;69:89–95
- Screening for bladder cancer using urine-based tumor markers. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2008;60:247–253
- Nomograms including nuclear matrix protein 22 for prediction of disease recurrence and progression in patients with Ta, T1, or CIS transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol. 2005;173:1518–1525
- Detection of bladder cancer using a point-of-care proteomic assay. JAMA. 2005;293:810–816
- Urine-based biomarkers for the early detection and surveillance of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2008;60:217–235
- The International Bladder Cancer Bank: Proposal for a new study concept. Urol Oncol. 2004;22:277–284
- Persistent uroplakin expression in advanced urothelial carcinomas: Implications in urothelial tumor progression and clinical outcome. Hum Pathol. 2007;38:1703–1713
- . Traditional and newer pathologic factors. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2001;(30):22–26
- Improved prediction of disease relapse after radical prostatectomy through a panel of preoperative blood-based biomarkers. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:3785–3791
- p53, p21, pRB, and p16 expression predict clinical outcome in cystectomy with bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1014–1024
- Multiple biomarkers improve prediction of bladder cancer recurrence and mortality in patients undergoing cystectomy. Cancer. 2008;112:315–325
- Use of combined apoptosis biomarkers for prediction of bladder cancer recurrence and mortality after radical cystectomy. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:128–136
- . Molecular classification of breast cancer: Implications for selection of adjuvant chemotherapy. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2006;3:621–632
- . Are biomarkers for bladder cancer beneficial?. J Urol. 2010;183:11–12
- . Challenges of cancer biomarker profiling. Eur Urol. 2007;52:1601–1609
- P53 as a prognostic marker for bladder cancer: A meta-analysis and review. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:678–686
- . Proteomics and cancer: Running before we can walk?. Nature. 2004;429:496–497
- . Proteomic patterns to identify ovarian cancer: 3 Years on. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2004;4:575–577
- Prospective evaluation of p53 as a prognostic marker in T1 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. BJU Int. 2007;99:281–285
- Pretreatment biomarker levels improve the accuracy of post-prostatectomy nomogram for prediction of biochemical recurrence. Prostate. 2009;69:886–894
- New circulating biomarkers for prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2008;11:112–120
- . New cancer biomarkers deriving from NCI early detection research (Recent results). Cancer Res. 2003;163:72–84Discussion 264–6
- Development of common data elements: The experience of and recommendations from the early detection research network. Int J Med Inform. 2003;70:41–48
- Bladder tumor markers beyond cytology: International Consensus Panel on bladder tumor markers. Urology. 2005;66(6 Suppl 1):35–63
- . Guidelines for development of diagnostic markers in bladder cancer. World J Urol. 2008;26:5–11
- Beyond prostate-specific antigen: New serologic biomarkers for improved diagnosis and management of prostate cancer. Rev Urol. 2004;6:58–72
- . Clinical trial designs for predictive biomarker validation: Theoretical considerations and practical challenges. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4027–4034
- . Clinical trial designs for predictive biomarker validation: One size does not fit all. J Biopharm Stat. 2009;19:530–542
- . Perspectives on prostate cancer biomarkers. Eur Urol. 2008;54:8–10
- An updated catalog of prostate cancer predictive tools. Cancer. 2008;113:3075–3099
- New blood-based biomarkers for the diagnosis, staging, and prognosis of prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2008;101:675–683
- Internal validation of predictive models: Efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:774–781
- . Nomograms introduction. Semin Urol Oncol. 2002;20:79–81
- . An introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Raton, (FL): Chapman and Hall/CRC; 1993;
- . Comparison of Cox regression with other methods for determining prediction models and nomograms. J Urol. 2003;170(6 Pt 2):S6–S9Discussion S10
- Internal and external validation of predictive models: A simulation study of bias and precision in small samples. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:441–447
- . Neural networks, logistic regression, and calibration. Med Decis Making. 1998;18:349–350
- Ki-67 is an independent predictor of bladder cancer outcome in patients treated with radical cystectomy for organ-confined disease. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:7369–7373
- Multi-institutional validation of the predictive value of Ki-67 labeling index in patients with urinary bladder cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:114–119
- . Role of biomarkers to predict outcomes and response to therapy. Urol Oncol. 2010;28:97–101
- . Decision curve analysis: A novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making. 2006;26:565–574
- Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers. BMC Med Inform Decis Making. 2008;8:53–70
- . Decision-analysis for the evaluation of diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers. Am Stat. 2008;62:314–320
- . Primer: Using decision-analysis to improve clinical decision making in urology. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2006;3:439–448
- Risk stratification for bladder tumor recurrence, stage, and grade by urinary nuclear matrix protein 22 and cytology. Eur Urol. 2004;45:304–313author reply 313
- . Heuristics and biases: Selected errors in clinical reasoning. Acad Med. 1999;74:791–794
- . Game relativity: How context influences strategic decision making. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006;32:131–149
- . Heuristic and linear models of judgment: Matching rules and environments. Psychol Rev. 2007;114:733–758
- Comparisons of nomograms and urologists' predictions in prostate cancer. Semin Urol Oncol. 2002;20:82–88
- . A catalog of prostate cancer nomograms. J Urol. 2001;165:1562–1568
- Predicting nonsentinel node status after positive sentinel lymph biopsy for breast cancer: Clinicians vs. nomogram. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:654–659
- Clinicians are poor raters of life-expectancy before radical prostatectomy or definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2007;100:1254–1258
- Nomogram for predicting disease recurrence after radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol. 2006;176(4 Pt 1):1354–1361Discussion 1361–2.
- Precystectomy nomogram for prediction of advanced bladder cancer stage. Eur Urol. 2006;50:1254–1260Discussion 1261–2
- Nomograms provide improved accuracy for predicting survival after radical cystectomy. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:6663–6676
- Comparison of nomograms with other methods for predicting outcomes in prostate cancer: A critical analysis of the literature. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:4400–4407
- Nomograms for bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2008;54:41–53
- . The use and abuse of data: Nomograms and talking to patients about clinical medicine. Urol Oncol. 2007;25:333–337
- Comparing tumor staging and grading systems: A case study and a review of the issues, using thymoma as a model. Stat Med. 2000;19:1997–2014
- Systematic review of statistical methods used in molecular marker studies in cancer. Cancer. 2008;112:1862–1868
- . Method for evaluating prediction models that apply the results of randomized trials to individual patients. Trials. 2007;8:14–25
- Clinical benefits of a multivariate prediction model for bladder cancer: A decision analytic approach. Cancer. 2009;115:5460–5469
- . Postoperative nomogram predicting risk of recurrence after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3967–3972
- Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1180–1184
- Tumor marker utility grading system: A framework to evaluate clinical utility of tumor markers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996;88:1456–1466
PII: S1078-1439(10)00053-0
doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.02.011
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Volume 28, Issue 4
, Pages 389-400
, July 2010
