Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Original articlePerioperative blood transfusion adversely affects prognosis after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma
Introduction
The effects of perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion (PBT) on morbidity, mortality, and disease recurrence following cancer surgery have previously been studied in several malignancies. Various studies in lung, patients with colorectal and hepatocellular cancer have demonstrated increased risk of tumor recurrence and disease specific mortality for patients who received PBT [1], [2], [3]. The reported association between blood transfusions and oncologic outcomes changed the nature (and the amount) of blood administration in many surgical disciplines. This link has increased awareness in recent years, as many surgeons are being more hesitant or even reluctant to administrate blood, unless it is clearly indicated. However, despite the apparent consensus, the correlation between blood transfusions and prognosis remains questionable in some malignancies. Focusing on urological malignancies, while the association between PBT and adverse oncological outcomes has been established in patients with bladder cancer [4], [5], such correlation is much less clear in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma [6], [7] or prostate cancer [8], [9], [10], [11]. Specifically for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), in the last decades, few retrospective studies examined the association between PBT and recurrence or survival after nephrectomy. Although part of the studies suggested that PBT resulted in increased cancer recurrence and cancer-specific mortality [12], [13], several suggested limited association with all-cause mortality [14] whereas others showed no significant associations with prognosis at all [15], [16], [17].
In view of these inconsistent findings, in the current study, we aimed to examine the incidence of PBT as well as the effect of positive margins on disease specific survival in patients undergoing curative surgery for RCC.
After obtaining institutional review board approval, we did a retrospective cohort study of 1,159 patients who underwent elective partial and RN for renal cancer, between the years 1988 and 2013. All operations were performed in the same surgical environment. All of the surgeries were performed by 5 senior surgeons who had performed at least 50 nephrectomies with each of the 2 surgical approaches (laparoscopic and open). Patient demographics and operative details were collected retrospectively. Clinicopathologic variables recorded included: age, gender, height, weight, and body mass index, comorbidities, preoperative hemoglobin (HB) levels, receipt of PBT, and number of units transfused. Operative variables included type of operation (i.e., open or laparoscopic). Pathological variables included capsular invasion, vascular invasion, renal pelvis invasion, perinephric fat extension, and tumor necrosis. Tumor stage was coded as a dichotomous variable, pT2 or less vs. pT3. Patients with benign histology (including metanephric adenomas, angiomyolipomas, oncocytomas, and others) were excluded from this analysis. Additional exclusion criteria included: patients with malignant tumors other than RCC (urothelial cell carcinoma, sarcoma, neuroendocrine tumor, squamous cell carcinoma, leiomyoma, and liposarcoma). And patients with metastatic disease upon diagnosis. PBT was defined as transfusion of allogenic red blood cells either during the day of operation or within the postoperative hospitalization. Notably, administration of PBT was based on the discretion of the treating physicians. No institutional standardized intraoperative or postoperative thresholds were used for transfusion. Transfusion with other blood products was not recorded. Follow-up was conducted according to accepted clinical practice at our institution. In general, follow-up consisted of physical examination, chest radiographs, and abdominal imaging every 6 to 12 months during the first 5 years and annually thereafter. Metastatic progression was defined as unequivocal imaging findings indicating distant organ involvement with or without a confirmatory diagnostic biopsy.
Statistical analysis was performed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses to determine features associated with PBT. Outcomes measured include recurrence-free survival (RFS; local and distant), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Survival was estimated as the time from nephrectomy to event using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between cohorts with the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the association of the different PBT groups with outcomes, controlling for clinicopathologic variables. Survival analysis was performed to the entire cohort first (RN and PN), and next, to the PN group “alone.” A P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, Version 22.0, Chicago, IL).
Section snippets
Results
Of the1,159 patients undergoing nephrectomy, 198 patients (17.1%) received a PBT (Table 1); the median number of units transfused was 2 (interquartile range: 1–3 units). Median follow-up after surgery was 63.2 months (interquartile range: 31.9–102.2; range: 6–322) during which time 165 (14.2%) patients had disease recurrence: 77 had local recurrence and 88 developed metastatic progression; 255 patients died, of whom, 55 died of renal cancer. Comparisons of the clinical and pathological features
Discussion
In the current study on a large cohort of patients undergoing nephrectomy for renal masses, we found that receipt of a PBT was associated with a significantly increased risk of cancer recurrence, death from RCC, and all-cause mortality. These associations remained when controlling for clinical and pathological features, suggesting an independent association of receipt of a PBT with adverse prognosis following nephrectomy. To date, multiple malignancies have been evaluated for the association of
Conclusions
PBT is associated with significantly increased risk of cancer recurrence, cancer-specific mortality, and overall mortality in patients undergoing PN as well as RN for RCC. This association remained when accounting for potential confounding clinical and pathologic features. Although these findings require further validation, continued efforts to minimize the use of blood products in patients with RCC are essential.
References (25)
- et al.
The impact of perioperative blood transfusion on cancer recurrence and survival following radical cystectomy
Eur Urol
(2013) - et al.
The relationship between perioperative blood transfusion and overall mortality in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer
Urol Oncol
(2013) - et al.
Impact of perioperative allogenic blood transfusion on survival after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Clin Genitourin Cancer
(2016) - et al.
Association of perioperative blood transfusion with oncologic outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Eur J Surg Oncol
(2014) - et al.
Effect of perioperative blood transfusion on prostate cancer recurrence
Urol Oncol
(2008) - et al.
Influence of blood transfusions during radical retropubic prostatectomy on disease outcome
Urology
(2006) - et al.
Effect of perioperative blood transfusion on mortality for major urologic malignancies
Clin Genitourin Cancer
(2015) - et al.
Effect of perioperative blood transfusion on mortality for major urologic malignancies
Clin Genitourin Cancer
(2015) - et al.
Prognostic value of capsular invasion for localized clear-cell renal cell carcinoma
Eur Urol
(2009) - et al.
Significance of macroscopic tumor necrosis as a prognostic indicator for renal cell carcinoma
J Urol
(2006)
Perioperative allogenenic blood transfusion is associated with worse clinical outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis
PLoS One
Perioperative blood transfusion adversely affects prognosis after resection of lung cancer: a systematic review and a meta-analysis
BMC Surg.
Cited by (20)
Impact of perioperative blood transfusion on survival in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor patients: analysis from the US Neuroendocrine Study Group
2020, HPBCitation Excerpt :Though the transfusion of blood and blood components remains common and necessary in many clinical scenarios, significant evidence over the last decade suggests that the practice is not without its risks. The immune-modulatory effects of PRBC transfusion has been well documented, and the critical importance of an intact immune system in the fight against cancer progression and recurrence is beginning to be appreciated.2,5–9,17–23,29–31 Though less fully explored than with other malignancies, some early evidence suggests that immune surveillance plays an important role in PNET progression as well.32,33
Perioperative blood transfusion affects oncologic outcomes after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2019, Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original InvestigationsQuality improvement in gynecologic oncology: Current successes and future promise
2019, Gynecologic OncologyImpact of Perioperative Blood Transfusions on the Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Kidney Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis
2019, Clinical Genitourinary CancerCitation Excerpt :In the field of kidney cancer surgery, early studies from the 80s and 90s on the association between PBT and outcomes of patients undergoing nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) had controversial findings.14-16 More recently, several studies suggested that use of PBT is associated with worse oncologic outcomes in these patients.17-22 The aim of the present study is to conduct a systematic review of the literature and a pooled analysis of studies investigating the association between PBT and oncologic outcomes of patients with RCC undergoing nephrectomy procedures.